Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 36(1): I-II, Jan.-Feb. 2021.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1155796
4.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 33(3): 224-232, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-958406

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: Hemodilution is a concern in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Using a smaller dual tubing rather than a single larger inner diameter (ID) tubing in the venous limb to decrease prime volume has been a standard practice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate these tubing options. Methods: Four different CPB circuits primed with blood (hematocrit 30%) were investigated. Two setups were used with two circuits for each one. In Setup I, a neonatal oxygenator was connected to dual 3/16" ID venous limbs (Circuit A) or to a single 1/4" ID venous limb (Circuit B); and in Setup II, a pediatric oxygenator was connected to dual 1/4" ID venous limbs (Circuit C) or a single 3/8" ID venous limb (Circuit D). Trials were conducted at arterial flow rates of 500 ml/min up to 1500 ml/min (Setup I) and up to 3000 ml/min (Setup II), at 36°C and 28°C. Results: Circuit B exhibited a higher venous flow rate than Circuit A, and Circuit D exhibited a higher venous flow rate than Circuit C, at both temperatures. Flow resistance was significantly higher in Circuits A and C than in Circuits B (P<0.001) and D (P<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: A single 1/4" venous limb is better than dual 3/16" venous limbs at all flow rates, up to 1500 ml/min. Moreover, a single 3/8" venous limb is better than dual 1/4" venous limbs, up to 3000 ml/min. Our findings strongly suggest a revision of perfusion practice to include single venous limb circuits for CPB.


Subject(s)
Humans , Oxygenators/standards , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/instrumentation , Cannula/standards , Pediatrics/instrumentation , Reference Standards , Temperature , Time Factors , Venous Pressure/physiology , Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Hemodilution , Models, Cardiovascular
6.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 30(6): 657-659, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-774549

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT As Marcelo Giugale published in the Financial Times, Latin America, on the whole, has not excelled at innovation - doing the same things in a new and better way or at doing new things. It has been slow to acquire, adopt and adapt technologies by this time available in other places[1]. Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not a new technology, its use in Latin America is not widespread as needed. Furthermore, we still have a number centers doing ECMO, not reporting their cases, lacking a structured training program and not registered with the extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO). With this scenario, and accepting that ECMO is the first step in any circulatory support program, it is difficult to anticipate the incorporation of new and more complex devices as the technologically advanced world is currently doing. However, the good news is that with the support of experts from USA, Europe and Canada the results in Latin America ELSO'S centers are improving by following its guidelines for training, and using a standard educational process. There is no doubt that we can learn a great deal from the high velocity organizations - the rabbits - whom everyone chases but never catches, that manage to stay ahead because of their endurance, responsiveness, and their velocity in self-correction[2].


Subject(s)
Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/instrumentation , Life Support Care/trends , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Latin America , Life Support Care/instrumentation
7.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 28(2): 248-255, abr.-jun. 2013.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-682436

ABSTRACT

ULTRAMINI-ABSTRACT: Although there are common grounds with adult cardiac surgery, it is important to understand the differences in the business plan, paths, manpower, mindset, training, and infrastructure that are essential in those institutions where pediatric cardiac surgery can and should be performed. Time to start thinking, it is not what we can do, but should we do it?.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Thoracic Surgery/trends , Leadership , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL